Summary:
Crypto.com’s SVP Steve Humenik expresses opposition to CFTC's proposed rule banning prediction markets.
The proposed regulation is seen as overly prescriptive and exceeds the CFTC's authority.
Humenik emphasizes the need to adhere to the three-step process outlined in the Commodity Exchange Act.
Calls for transparency in the CFTC's decision-making process.
Urges the CFTC to seek clarification from Congress regarding ambiguities in the CEA.
Crypto.com’s Senior VP Opposes CFTC Regulation
Steve Humenik, Senior Vice President of Crypto.com, has joined Coinbase in opposing a proposed rule change by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that could potentially ban prediction markets and event contracts in the United States. In a letter addressed to the CFTC, Humenik raised significant concerns regarding the implications of this regulation and urged the Commission to reconsider its approach.
Concerns Over Regulatory Authority
In a detailed letter dated August 8, 2024, Humenik articulated his strong opposition to the proposed rule, arguing it is overly prescriptive and exceeds the CFTC’s statutory authority. He highlighted that the existing process for reviewing and approving event contracts is adequate and should remain unchanged. Humenik stated:
We urge [the CFTC] not to finalize this proposed rule as written, and to consider withdrawing it altogether.
Importance of Adhering to Established Processes
Humenik emphasized that the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) outlines a three-step process for evaluating event contracts, which he believes the CFTC is bypassing with this new proposal. He insisted that it is crucial for the Commission to adhere to these established procedures, especially when determining whether a contract involves an “excluded commodity.” Furthermore, he called for transparency in the CFTC's decision-making process to avoid blanket prohibitions on entire classes of event contracts without thorough, individualized reviews.
Seeking Clarification from Congress
Additionally, Humenik suggested that the CFTC should seek clarification from Congress regarding ambiguities in the CEA, particularly concerning what appears to be a drafting error in the statute. He concluded by expressing support for effective regulation of derivatives markets, but insisted that any modifications to the regulation of event contracts should be principles-based and grounded in existing legal frameworks unless directed otherwise by Congress.
What are your thoughts on the letter from Crypto.com’s SVP to the CFTC? Share your opinions in the comments below!
Comments