Summary:
Craig Wright's $1.1 trillion lawsuit dismissed by a UK judge.
BTC Core named in the lawsuit is a non-existent entity.
Court states that Wright's claims about being Satoshi Nakamoto are dishonest.
Judge emphasizes Wright cannot assert intellectual property rights due to previous court orders.
Wright's copyright claims deemed untenable without ownership proof.
Craig Wright's Failed Lawsuit Against Bitcoin
In a recent ruling, a UK judge has dismissed Craig Wright's $1.1 trillion lawsuit claiming rights to Bitcoin. This lawsuit, which names a non-existent entity he refers to as âBTC Core,â alleges that this entity comprises 122 corporate entities and 22 individuals involved in Bitcoin development.
The Court's Ruling
The court stated that COPA and others assert that BTC Core is merely a fabrication of Wright's, intended to implicate those involved in Bitcoin's evolution as part of a partnership that does not exist. The judge emphasized that itâs unnecessary to resolve the issue of whether such a partnership exists.
Wright's Previous Claims
Wright's lawsuit seems to repeat his dishonest claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto, a point the judge did not overlook. Despite Wright's arguments to the contrary, the court found that his current claims still included references to his supposed identity as Bitcoin's creator. The judge remarked that Wright's new claims could not be maintained without asserting intellectual property rights that were previously barred by court order.
Copyright Claims Under Scrutiny
The ruling also addressed Wright's copyright claims, stating that he could not assert these claims without proving ownership of the rights he alleged were infringed. The judge noted that without a license or assignment from the alleged copyright owner, Wright's claims were untenable.
This ruling marks another significant setback for Wright in his ongoing legal battles related to Bitcoin, further diminishing his credibility in the crypto community.
Comments