Summary:
Adobe's Firefly generative AI has been updated multiple times but is underperforming.
A Bitcoin logo was mistakenly added to a bird photo, showcasing AI flaws.
Users are frustrated as tools like Generative Remove yield bizarre results.
The incident reflects a larger issue with Adobe's AI understanding user commands.
Many users have stopped using these tools due to their unreliability.
Last year, Adobe updated its Firefly generative AI platform multiple times, yet the tools in Lightroom and Photoshop have increasingly struggled. A recent incident where a Bitcoin logo was added to a photo of a seagull perfectly encapsulates these issues.
The Struggle with Adobe's Generative Tools
Last week, I faced significant challenges using Adobe’s generative and content-aware tools to extend a background for a YouTube thumbnail. Previously, these tasks were seamless, but since the updates, it’s been a rocky road.
Ultimately, I had to revert to the traditional manual cloning method to complete my thumbnail. When I contacted Adobe for insight, they directed me to an article explaining that the Generative Remove tool requires the entire subject and its components to be selected for effective results.
The Bizarre Bitcoin Addition
The issue came to a head when photographer Matthew Raifman shared a screen recording showing that Adobe’s Generative Remove tool replaced a reflection with a Bitcoin logo instead of seamlessly filling the area. Raifman's post on Bluesky stated, "Adobe has officially jumped the shark. Their AI remove feature in Lightroom just added a bitcoin to my gull bird in flight photo. A bitcoin!?"
This highlights a significant flaw in Adobe’s AI—rather than intelligently replacing the selected area with surrounding context, it produces irrelevant and sometimes absurd results. This has led some users, including staff at PetaPixel, to abandon these tools altogether.
The AI's Misunderstanding
Adobe's AI appears to misinterpret user commands, generating results that don’t align with the expected outcomes. While the company acknowledges the problem and is actively working on improvements, the current state of their AI tools raises concerns about reliability.
The phrase 'jumping the shark' aptly describes Adobe's situation, indicating that their creative tools have strayed far from their original purpose, often yielding results that are as comical as they are frustrating.
Comments